Odd confirmation entry Santa Maria Mecatabasco, Villa del Refugio, Zac. Domingo Serna

The confirmation Book ( there is only one )for the Villa del Refugio,Zac.
Image no. 37 of 607.

Comentarios

Comentario

No idea. I guess were making weekly payments, either to pay a loan, to pay some church services, or who knows what. They had a house as collateral.
Regards,
Victoriano Navarro

Comentario

It is very hard to read but here is what I can understand:

J. Jesus Serna y Antº Serna hijos, de D. Domingo Serna, ...
11 pesos 84 (centavos), abonaron 4 (pº ¿pesos?) cada 8 dias, comenzando el 1º el (sab crossed out, they were writing sábado) Do-
mingo que .... 8 del presente y si .............
cargo del .... garantiza la casa de morada situada en la ...
..... D. Domingo Serna, y .... por Jesus
Serna y Antº R... Antº Serna ¿Angel? R.... Pedro ..
y Trinidad Hernandz. .....

Victoriano Navarro

Baptism of Jose Lorenzo Chavez

I'm having a hard time trying to decipher exactly what my great-great-great grandfather's birth record says. I know the following information:

Comentarios

Recording the Image Number from LDS online records, for my own records... Bad Idea ?

I have been reconcidering my practice of recording page numbers, entry number for the person (If given), and also the IMAGE NUMBER.

Comentarios

Comentario

I have been recording image numbers on all my entries for the past year when I started my genealogy research. I have found it extremely useful whenever I needed to go back to locate and review a record. Downloading and or printing all these records just seems like an arduous task. There have been many times that I have found a record that was not in correct chronological order. Sometimes the parish records alternate dates between the main church and an auxiliary location. And of course sometimes the date recorded is inaccurate (for example Jan 2013 is recorded as Jan 2012).
Well in fact the Jalisco parish records I research were updated on Feb 25. To my surprise I noticed that my entries for marriages for Juchitlan 1860-1878 records no longer point to the correct image! Upon further inspection I discovered that they added about 50-80 images to this particular collection, which makes absolutely no sense since the new images added were for marriages from 1922. I do not yet know if any other collection records now have new image numbers. Now I am torn between updating the image numbers or just deleting them altogether. Either way, it will be a lot of work since I have almost 3,000 people in my tree. How frustrating!
Juan J

Comentario

When they started putting the microfilms online, every single image had a code number which appeared as you downloaded it. Later they got rid of it. Nevertheless, I think it is a good idea to write down both the microfilm number and the image number, even if either becomes useless in the future. Some records are relatively easy to find without image number since all the records in the series follow a chronological order. But if you have a section with 3000 images and no strict chronological order (as with some of the Dispensas), then an image number becomes a must.
Victoriano Navarro

Comentario

David

I would not go so far as to say this is a bad idea, but you need to know the issues with such a citation.

The FHL is simply a repository of a copy of these records. The film number, image number are simply from their system of cataloging and presenting the record. The url of the source is simply the current electronic repository, which (1) may change as systems are updated or (2) could simply go away if the system becomes unfunded or unsupported (for the FHL this is highly unlikely).

I think the proper citation for the record (for church or civil records) should be:
author (Catholic Church or Civil Authorities)
Parish (for church only) and location
record type (baptisms, marriages, etc)
volume number or year(s) covered
page or folio number (if used)
record number if used

Along with this information, you should note the repository (FHL), their film and image number, as well as the date you extracted the information.

Family Search does provide some guidance on citing records; here are a couple of examples. Personally, I think their citations are incomplete: if you were look at the 1930 census for the Jose Lara record from a different source, how would you find this record?

From the 1930 Mexico National Census

"México, censo nacional, 1930," index and images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/M2H9-LC7 : accessed 02 Mar 2013), José Lara in entry for Luz Lara, 1930.

From the indexed (and image linked) church records

"México, Distrito Federal, registros parroquiales y diocesanos, 1514-1970," index and images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/F32V-2DK : accessed 02 Mar 2013), Alonso García and Matilde Pontones, 1924.

I think that the main thing to keep in mind is that the FHL is simply a repository of a copy of these records, and not the author.

George Fulton
Pleasanton, CA

Comentario

I have a minor disagreement with George on this issue. First, let me say that I agree completely that all of the information George lists is important, including the FHL film and image numbers; but I think the film and image numbers are extremely important for the reason that, for many of the early years, the films contain not only mixed dates, but also mixed events—that is, baptisms, marriages, confirmations, and burials may be mixed within one film number.

I have taken great pains to generate an index of the contents of the films I have accessed over the past year and a half, which has proven invaluable to me, especially when I return to a particular film again and again.

Here is one, almost comical, example of how a film can contain mixed information; it is FHL Film 280854 from Ocotlán. The FHL catalogue says that this film is "Bautismos 1610-1723 (incluye algunos matrimonios)", but this is the 'true' catalogue of this film (as accurately as I have been able to define it):

@i005: vol. 1, bautismos, 1610–1623
@i044: matrimonios, 1610—1630
@i048: bautismos, 1634
@i049: matrimonial tables (I haven't quite figured this one out yet)
@i052: bautismos y matrimonios, mixed, 1636–1639
@i055: bautismos, 1636
@i064: vol. 2, bautismos, 1639–1664
@i138: matrimonios, 1639–1664
@i169: bautismos (españoles), 1639–1664
@i180: matrimonios, 1648–1651
@i184: entierros, 1651–1655
@i188: vol. 3, bautismos, 1664–1684
@i269: casamientos, 1664–1684
@i335: casamientos y bautismos (images are upside-down), 1694–1669
@i338: vol. 4, bautismos, 1667–1694
@i377: casamientos (upside-down), 1694–1669
@i396: bautismos, 1652–1695
@i401: bautismos, 1694 (entries are mixed)
@i403: matrimonios, 1694–1723
@i406: vol. 5, bautismos, 1695–1723
@i523: matrimonios (upside-down), 1723–1694

So why do I bother to go to all this trouble to catalogue more than 220 films so far (and counting)? Because if I find a reference in FamilySearch that says that a marriage took place in, say, Ocotlán on a particular date in 1672, I know that is can be found on FHL film 280854 between images 377 and 396, and I don't have to search the entire film to locate the record. Yes, the online images may be changed or go away entirely; but I suspect the likelihood of that's happening is small, and in the meantime, my documentation points me to the specific image on the particular film, and that, after all, is the purpose of documentation—to allow others to replicate your source material directly without their having to reproduce your search.

Best wishes,
Lawrence Bouett
Orinda, CA

Comentario

One further comment on why I catalogue the FHL Films I use and use image numbers in my citations: some—perhaps many—of the FHL film descriptions are incorrect; for example, this is the FHL online catalogue description of FHL Film 221879 (Lagos de Moreno): "Confirmaciones 1728 -- Bautismos 1607-1640 -- Matrimonios 1638 -- Confirmaciones 1680 -- Casamientos 1605-1637 -- Confirmaciones 1634 -- ? 1612-1634 -- Defunciones, Matrimonios 1638-1634 -- Bautismos 1647-1649, 1627-1628, 1615-1620 -- Matrimonios 1612-1635 -- Defunciones 1681, 1659-1673". Well, in cataloging this film, I discovered that, between images 324 and 329, there are marriages that date from 1586! Incredibly, I found a marriage record that I needed from 1588, which I would never have found had I not had my catalogue; it is the earliest record I have found online thus far on any FHL film ...

Lawrence Bouett
Orinda, CA

Defuncion de Maria Garcia

Necesito ayuda, no entiendo las palabras que dice de que murio? Muchas gracias, Nora

Comentarios

Comentario

Necesito ayuda, no entiendo las palabras que dice de que murio? Muchas gracias, Nora

Mexico, Jalisco, Civil Registration, 1857-2000
San Julián
Defunciones 1942-1960
Image of 615

Comentario

Si Angelina no hubiera transcrito cardíaco no hubiera podido entender la otra palabra.

María García murió de un síncope cardíaco.

Saludos,
Armando

Comentario

Salonwithin,

Tiene razon, esta dificil leer el documento. Segun le entendi, murio de
algun mal cardiaco.

-Angelina-

-----Original Message-----

No entiendo de que fallecio , Maria Garcia? Espero que me puedas ayudar,
gracias.

Comentario

María García falleció de un síncope cardiaco, o sea un paro cardiaco. Le dejó de funcionar el corazón.

BILL FIGUEROA

----- Original Message -----
From: salonwithin@ymail.com
To: research@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 5:21 PM
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Maria Garcia

No entiendo de que fallecio , Maria Garcia? Espero que me puedas ayudar, gracias.

Mexico, Jalisco, Civil Registration, 1857-2000 San Julián Defunciones 1942-1960 Image of 615

Help reading Villa Del Refugio, Santa Maria Mecatabasco, Zac. Marriage

Thanks for any translations..
The entry is from Villa Del Refugio, Santa Maria Mecatabasco, Zac.

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-15087-14291-97?cc=1804458&wc…

Comentarios

Comentario

Yo el DrDn (Doctor Don) Juan Jose Dias de Sandi The. (teniente, incumbent) cura case y vele in facie eclesie a Jose Simon Rojas con Maria de Jesus Yna (india) de este Puº (pueblo). Ps (padrinos, godparents) Jose Alejo Elauterio y Jose Alejo Eluterio, y Maria Josefa Migl Guadalaxara y Xavier Monico y lo firme con el Sor (señor) cura ...

Victoriano Navarro

9tna is this an abreviation for Yndia ?

I have seen this abbrev. Otna or something that looks like a curvy 9tna .. It was seen in my recent post and again in another post following a persons name..What is this ..

Comentarios

i'm having a hard time reading this dispensation page

i found the marriage dispensation for joseph roman & josefa cid caldera

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18413-45522-2?cc=1874591&wc=…

Comentarios

Comentario

Brothers:
Pº Carrillo Dabila (senior) & Juan Carrillo de Davila were flesh brothers.

First cousins:
Pº Carrillo Davila (junior the legitimate son of the said Pº Carrillo Dabila)and Mª Carrillo (the legitimate daughter of Juan Carrillo Davila) were fist cousins, and grandparents of the groom and bride.

Second cousins:
Mª Carrillo and Pº Sid Caldera (senior) are the parents of Pº Sid Caldera (junior, father of the bride).
Pº Carrillo (junior) was the father of Mª Carrillo (the younger, mother of the groom).

The parents of bride and groom are second cousins (they share great grandparents)

Regards,
Victoriano Navarro

Orozco Moreno from San Diego de Alejandría

There is an Orozco Moreno family of which I am looking for their ancestors and cannot find them.

Comentarios

Comentario

Hello Jose, my family was also from San Diego de Alejandria, Jalisco. My paternal great-grandmother was Maria Refugia Camarena Ayala, b. 1861 and married my great-grandfather, Guadalupe Gutierrez, b. 1853. I went on the GeneaNet website and found the genealogy chart for my great-grandmother---click on website below to see the chart and see if we have "parentisco."
http://gw5.geneanet.org/sanchiz?lang=en;p=maria+refugia;n=camarena=ayala

Hope this helps.

Ann Marie Gutierrez

Comentario

Hi Ann Marie

Thanks for the info. The Guadalupe Camarena I am looking for was a grandmother already on 1803, so I am guessing she must have been born around 1755 or 1765. In the chart you send me there is a Guadalupe Camarena borned around 1785 whom in 1803 would´ve been 18 years old, so I am almost sure she is not the one. Thanks anyway and if i find something I´ll let you know.

Regards
Jose Humberto

LDS film - I am unable to identify this church Reducinda Rojas

I only see the Diosecees of Durango, I have been unable to find this film online .
This is the record im searching for.

name: Maria Rudecinda Rojas
gender: Female

Comentarios

about the pedro cid caldera and his wife maria carrillo

i've seen several family trees showing maria carrillo also also being his niece. how was this connect made. I can't seem to find any document showing who maria carrillo's parents are.

Comentarios

Comentario

Well, I would ask the creators of the trees for their sources-- I've seen plenty of mistakes on Ancestry. I would stick with the contemporary documents, and if the creators of the trees identify a source, then I would follow up. I personally haven't seen a relationship like the one you saw.

Rosalinda

Comentario

i just found this today
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18413-46122-90?cc=1874591&wc…

i wonder if the owner of the tree assumed the pedro carrillo davila on the tree was the same one who married catalina cid caldera(i haven't found enough evidence to proove this assumption right or wrong.)
i think this tree has some errors in it. first of all joseph roman's mother was maria carrillo, yet josefa cid caldera(her parents are pedro cid caldera and juana rosales)'s name was put under maria carrillo name

Looking For 1827 Dispensa

Joseph this message doesn't seem to show up on the Nuestros Ranchos
website.

Comentarios

Comentario

The Dispensas were only required if the couple getting married had some kind of family relation (by blood, by marriage, by "illicit relations", etc.). I don't know if all the marriage permits listed in the Dispensas have duplicate entries in the Información matrimonial records. That's a good question.
So, family relation of some kind, you MUST get a Dispensa; no family relation at all, you are OK just with Información matrimonial.
Regards,
Victoriano Navarro

Comentario

I know for sure that there are marriages where the Información Matrimonial record is available as well as the dispensa as well as the regular marriage record.

I think that the Información Matrimonial records that can't be found are simply missing. Just as many baptism and marriage records are simply missing.

Saludos,
Armando

Research Digest, Vol 85, Issue 20

Joseph What is this??????

In a message dated 2/28/2013 5:38:07 P.M.

Comentarios

Comentario

What happens is that someone hacks into a members email account and then
once they are in they can send out messages to anyone in their address book.
This is what appears to have happened. Once I saw the message I immediately
suspended Raul Macias account and will reinstate in only after he replies to
me assuring me that he has changed his password and is confident that this
will not happen again.

Sorry but there is nothing that can be done to prevent this from
occasionally happening. If someone has any ideas please send them to me
directly so we can consider this: joseph@nuestrosranchos.org

Joseph

=========================

Joseph Puentes
Clean@h2opodcast.com
http://h2opodcast.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org [mailto:research-
> bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of MMG8938@aol.com
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 4:12 PM
> To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Research Digest, Vol 85, Issue 20
>
> Joseph What is this??????
>
>
> In a message dated 2/28/2013 5:38:07 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> maciasraul@ymail.com writes:
>
>

Comentario

It's spam that got through!

Alicia

________________________________
From: "MMG8938@aol.com"
To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2013 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Research Digest, Vol 85, Issue 20

Joseph  What is this??????

In a message dated 2/28/2013 5:38:07 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
maciasraul@ymail.com writes:

candy send me a pic of a sexually expicit use of your favorite  toy?

------------------------------
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013  3:07 PM PST
research-request@lists.nuestrosranchos.org wrote:

>Send  Research mailing list submissions to
>    research@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe  via the World Wide Web, visit
>   
http://lists.nuestrosranchos.org/listinfo.cgi/research-nuestrosranchos…
>
>or,  via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    research-request@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
>
>You can reach the  person managing the list at
>    research-owner@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
>
>When replying, please  edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of  Research digest..."
>
>
>Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing  List
>DAILY  DIGEST
>****************************************
>
>
>Today's  Topics:
>
>  1. Looking For 1827 Dispensa (Joseph  Puentes)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message:  1
>Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:52:45 -0500
>From: "Joseph Puentes" 
>To: 
>Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos]  Looking For 1827 Dispensa
>Message-ID:  <045001ce15ba$e2f6ab80$a8e40280$@rr.com>
>Content-Type:  text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
>
>I have a Macos Diaz  married to a Cipriana Godina (see:
>http://tinyurl.com/c97mo2f) and in  that record it says there is a
Dispensa.
>I was first looking in the  Informacion Matrimonial and couldn't find
>anything.
>
> 
>
>My question is I know it is probably in the Guadalajara  Dispensas but
>wouldn't there be information in the Informacion  Matrimonial films as
well?
>What determines if there is only info in the  Informacion Matrimonial films
>or only in the Guadalajara Dispensa  films?
>
>
>
>Thanks for your help,
>
> 
>
>Joseph
>
>
>
>
>
>Joseph  Puentes
>
>Clean@h2opodcast.com
>
>http://h2opodcast.com
>
> 
>
> 
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>--  -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>Nuestros Ranchos Research Mailing  List
>
>To post, send email  to:
>research(at)nuestrosranchos.org
>
>To change your  subscription, log on  to:
>http://www.nuestrosranchos.org
>
>
>
>End  of Research Digest, Vol 85, Issue  20
>****************************************

Delgado, Chevarria, Martin Chaves

I'm reguesting a lead on Bartholome Delgado and Francisca Merquelin Chevarria my 9th Great grandparents. They married on April 3, 1701 in Pinos, Zacatecas.

Nicolas Sanchez Moreno and Maria Flores (de la Torre?), Lagos de Moreno/La Barca

Hello Everyone,

I have hit a wall regarding Nicolas Sanchez Moreno and Maria Flores who had in Lagos de Moreno, Jalisco

A)Pedro Jose b. 1713

Comentarios

Comentario

Hello,
I placed the links below upon looking at the ones from La Barca they appear to be a different family. I have not been able to find the marriage for Nicolas and Maria either. Thanks for your help.

A)Pedro Jose b. 1713 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18573-16784-4?cc=1874591&wc=…

B)Luisa (Moreno) b. 1715 m. to Ylario Parada on 21 Jan 1734 in Lagos
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18573-16683-32?cc=1874591&wc…
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18571-5811-56?cc=1874591&wc=…

C)Ana Maria b. 1717 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18573-16437-44?cc=1874591&wc…

D)Jose b. 1719 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18568-47310-20?cc=1874591&wc…

E)Miguel Tomas b. 1721 m. Maria Antonia Dias on 18 February 1743 in Atotonilco el Alto
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18568-46460-61?cc=1874591&wc…
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18428-30555-43?cc=1874591&wc…

F)Maria Francisca b. 1723 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/NBM8-T5W

G)Juana Quieteria b. 1725 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18568-45073-18?cc=1874591&wc…

H)Maria Guadalupe b. 1728 m. to Jose Antonio Munoz on 4 Feb 1744 in Lagos
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18568-43591-67?cc=1874591&wc…
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18560-26564-34?cc=1874591&wc…

I)Antonio Teodicio b. 1730 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18562-61171-43?cc=1874591&wc…

Comentario

I wasn't able to find a connection to any of the other families in Lagos. The puesto or haciendo El Potrero could be a clue to finding a relation to one of them. I don't know who owned it or which families lived there or even the geographical location. If you can get that info it might be of help.

Also look through the volumes of Información Matrimonial for 1713-1715, 1711-1712, and 1711 to see if you can find a record for Nicolas Sanchez Moreno and Maria Flores.

Armando

Comentario

Hello,

I have some more information that may help find the origins of this couple. After some more searching I have not found the marriage for Nicolas and Maria yet but I have found some more marriages of their children.

A)Maria Francisca b. 1723 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/NBM8-T5W married Jose Leonardo de Parada y Villalpando (brother of Hilario)29 May 1742 in Lagos de Moreno.
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18560-23046-99?cc=1874591&wc…

B)Juana Quieteria b. 1725 https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18568-45073-18?cc=1874591&wc… married Jose Ramon Parada (brother of Leonardo and Hilario)6 Jun 1745 in Lagos de Moreno. https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18560-25896-39?cc=1874591&wc…

It seems that the Parada family was close to the Sanchez Flores Family. The rancho they lived at Los Conejos is close to a rancho called El Potrero de Afuera both in Lagos. The mother of the three brothers used different surnames (Manriques, Villalpando, and Navarette) so I have not been able to figure out their origins either. It seems, also, that Miguel, Luisa, Maria Francisca used the name Angulo after the 1740's. Luisa and Maria Francisca used, indiscriminately, the names: Moreno, Sanchez, Flores, and Angulo. Miguel was the patriarch of a large family of Angulos that settled in the Atotonilco el Alto area.

In the marriage of Maria Francisca and Leonardo Parada Francisca's father Nicolas uses the name Angulo Moreno.

While I was looking through the marriage records of Lagos a man named Francisco Sanchez Moreno is a testigo in some of the marriages. I believe he was the progeny of the marriage of a Francisco Sanchez and Ana Tavera that took place in Lagos 27 Sep 1620 due to his disaperance from the records around the late 1600's and the death record of a Francisco Sanchez Tavera (Bachiller) that gives his death as 3 April 1698 in Lagos de Moreno. The marriage record of Francisco and Ana only shows the names of the two. I believe Francisco Sanchez and Ana Tevera to be the grandparents of Nicolas but do not have records to prove it yet.

I have also seen in Lagos records reference to an Andres Sanchez who was the owner of El Labor de San Antonio or Hacienda San Antonio before Carlos de Alcala was its owner in the first half of the 1600's. Carlos was the grandfather of a number of Alcala's who were the godparents of the children of Nicolas and Maria. It may be a possibility that Andres Sanchez and Francisco Sanchez were related.

Also the baptismal godparents of Nicolas and Maria's children seem interesting to note, not sure how much it can help find their origins however.

Godfather of Luisa Sanchez: Estaban de Anda Altamirano y Moreno, the son of Esteban de Anda Saenz de Viduarre and his first wife Josefa Moreno de Ortega.

Godmother of Juana Quiteria Sanchez: Francisca Xaviera de Anda y Moreno, sister of Esteban and wife of Alonso III Moreno de Ortega.
Godfather of Juana: Manuel Alcala Hurtado de Mendoza brother-in-law of Esteban de Anda and son of Lucas Alcala y Garcia de Lara and Maria Guerra Valdes Gallardo (sister of Lorenzo)

Godfather of Miguel Sanchez: Miguel de Alcala Hurtado de Mendoza, brother of Manuel.

Godfather of Jose Sanchez Moreno: Bernardo Rodriguez de Portugal son of Alferez of Lagos Francisco Rodriguez and Ana Gomez de Portugal.

Godfather of Ana Maria Sanchez: Antonio Landeros, son of Agustin Landeros and Juana Gonzalez de Laris (Rubalcava) who was married to Clara Rodriguez de Portugal widow of Lorenzo Guerra Valdez Gallardo owner of Los Sauces and the sister of Bernardo Rodriguez Portugal.

Godparents of Maria Guadalupe Sanchez: Juan de Villalobos Campo and Antonia Petra Galvan de Rojas.

Once again thanks for your time and help and to everyone at Nuestros Ranchos for fantastic resources it offers to all of us. Thanks!

Regards,
Richard Ibarra

Comentario

Richard,

That's great work you have done in your investigation.

Juan de Villalobos Campo and Antonia Petra Galvan de Rojas were my ancestors. Four of their children married into the Moreno de Ortega family. Nicolás Sánchez Moreno is probably related to the Moreno de Ortega family based on what you have posted.

The first Esteban de Anda Altamirano was the original owner of San Antonio de los Sauces according to a book by Mario Gómez Mata cronista de Lagos de Moreno. He was the grandfather of Esteban de Anda Altamirano y Sáenz de Vidaurre who married Josefa Moreno de Ortega y González de Hermosillo. I don't know if there was another San Antonio at the time.

The Moreno de Ortega family also married into the Gómez de Portugal and Rodríguez de Portugal family. They also married into the Ortiz de Parada family a few times. The Parada family you are talking about probably descend from Sebastián de Parada and María Ortíz de Saavedra which who gave their descendants the Ortiz de Parada compounded surname.

Some of the families mentioned had relatives in Guanajuato in the towns of San Felipe, San Pedro Piedra Gorda (Ciudad Manuel Doblado), León, and San Francisco del Rincón.

Sánchez could come from Sánchez de Porras and Flores could come from Flores de la Torre (Flores a la Torre).

I wish I could be of more help. Maybe someone else can help more.

Armando

Comentario

Hello,

Thanks again for the info. I finally found the informacion matrimonial for Nicolas Sanchez Moreno and Maria Flores. Here is a link to the page: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18576-8384-92?cc=1874591&wc=…

It says Nicolas was the son of "padres no conocidos" so maybe he was adopted by the Sanchez Morenos, or was an illegitimate son of a woman of the Sanchez Moreno family and an unknown Angulo. The second option could explain why in the 1740's Nicolas and some of his children started going by the last name Angulo, as he may have found out who his father was. Any ideas on how to get more information on stuff like this?

Also I found a couple more members of the Sanchez Moreno family,

Onofre Sanchez Moreno m. Maria Rojas and had Onofre Bernabe Sanchez Moreno

Maria Rojas died 27 May 1703 vuida de Onofre her son was her Alvacea
and Onofre Bernabe died 27 May 1713 leaving Br. Jacinto Gonzalez de Laris as his Alvacea

Maria Flores was the daughter of Nicolas Flores and Petronila Ponce, originally from Teocaltiche but had been staying with her aunt Josefa Moya married to Simon Perez in Lagos- thats how she met Nicolas Sanchez. I found the Marriage of Nicolas Flores and Petronila as well in Teocaltiche, Petronila is the daughter of Diego Ponce and Josefa Moya or Chavez Fragoso and Nicolas is listed as the son of Francisco Flores and Francisca Flores both from Jalostotitlan.

Also concerning the Parada family the Sanchez family married, the informacion matrimonial of Leonardo Parada and Maria del Rosario Angulo Moreno states they were originally from the villa de Leon. Could that help find their origins as well? Heres the link to the images, this is also the first time Nicolas Sanchez uses the name Angulo.

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18569-67359-86?cc=1874591&wc…

Thanks in advanced for any help.

Richard Ibarra

Comentario

How did you know that the mother of Petronila Ponce used the surname Chávez Fragoso? Do you have names of the parents of Josefa Moya or Chávez Fragoso?

A sister of Petronila, Rosa María, married Manuel Chávez Fragoso y Villalobos according to the following page

http://gw5.geneanet.org/sanchiz?lang=es;p=manuel;n=chavez+fragoso+villa…

I looked up the marriage record and it states there was a dispensa

Film 299823 Matrimonios 1663-1702

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-12446-30278-40?cc=1410092&…

That dispensa has not been indexed. It's possible that dispensa is in one of the following two films

Guadalajara Matrimonios 1690-1709 Film 167980 938 pages
Guadalajara Matrimonios 1693-1712 Film 167981 394 pages

Have you found anything more on Francisco Flores and Francisca Flores?

You have been doing a great job with your investigation. If you keep looking at marriages of descendants you might find a dispensa that could help you with Nicolás Sánchez Moreno. Other documents that could help you are wills which aren't indexed for Jalisco. Only a trip to Lagos would help you there.

Armando

Comentario

Hey Armando

I noticed Josefa de Moya used Chavez in the baptisms of some of her children:
Rosa Maria https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/ND1N-SQB
and
Alejandro https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/J93R-XQG

I assumed because of Rosa Maria's marriage to Manuel Chavez Fragoso Josefa was also a Chavez Fragoso and noticed there was a couple Pedro Chavez Fragoso and Jacinta Moya that seemed to line up chronologically making her Manuel's First Cousin. Of course the dispensa would be needed to prove this but its my working hypothesis until I get a chance to look through those dispensas.

I tried looking for Francisco and Francisca Flores but I couldn't find anything. I also looked through Retonos de Espana en la Nueva Galicia to see if they were in the Flores de la Torre chapter but no luck there. Seeing as they were listed as being from Jalostotitlan I'm leaning towards the idea of them being related in some way to Diego Flores de la Torre y Arias de Valdes, son of the last Encomendero and who was Alcalde Mayor of Lagos and teniente de Alcalde in Jalostotitlan, marrying- supposedly in Jalostotitlan- Teresa Gonzalez de Hermosillo y Gonzalez Florida. However I have no documentary evidence yet just hypothesis.

I've looked at as many of the Informacion Matrimoniales as I could for Nicolas Sanchez's decendents but can not find any mention of his parents yet. Wills sadly will have to wait a while if I can only view them by going to Lagos.

By the way if there are some people in Compostela Nayarit by the name Sanchez Moreno with relationships to an Angulo family there, how likely is it that they are related to the family in Lagos?

Thanks for all your help by the way I really appreciate it.

Richard Ibarra

Santa Fe RR Section Houses

Do any of you have parents or grandparents raised in the section houses of
the Santa Fe RR during the 1920s to 1950s in San Bernardino or Riverside
Counties?

Comentarios

Comentario

are you talking abt box cars or homes owned by the railroad?
I know when my grandparents came in 1916 from Jerez, Zac they went to Idaho for the railroad and their first child died there and another was born there.. it was just a box car, hot in the summer and cold in the winter but all the Mexican workers lived in them.
Linda Castanon-Long
Boulder City, Nv

________________________________
From: Raquel Ruiz
To: general@nuestrosranchos.org
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:44 PM
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Santa Fe RR Section Houses

Do any of you have parents or grandparents raised in the section houses of
the Santa Fe RR during the 1920s to 1950s in San Bernardino or Riverside
Counties?  These would have included  San Bernardino (4th St), Verdemont,
Keenbrook, Cajon, Summit, Hesperia, Oro Grande, Hodge, Barstow, Redlands,
Menifee, Box Springs, Riverside (not an exhaustive list).  Spurred by a
reference to the section workers in the latest Somos Primos, I've decided
to use the family info I've already collected, supplement it, and write at
least one article to document this short-lived way of life.  My parents
grew up in the section houses and most of my male relatives for two
generations worked at some time for the Santa Fe.  There is little to
nothing written about life in the section houses, and photos are rare.
Unfortunately,  most families were too poor to own a camera and those that
did were not thinking of documenting their housing.

If you have any stories or photos to share, please email me.  Thanks so
much.

Raquel Ruiz
ruiz.raquel061@gmail.com

Comentario

Linda,
I'm talking about the ones in permanent housing, primarily the cement ones
(the earlier ones were wood). I know what you are talking about, though.
When my grandfather was a foreman he was in charge of a mobile section crew
(aka chain gang). They all lived in converted box cars. As the foreman he
had a boxcar of his own, which was part living quarters, part office. At
that time and place (mid to late 40s to 60s), San Bernardino, the families
of the men lived in the section house in town (if space was available)
while the men were in "el campo", living in boxcars converted into bunk
houses, with cook and dining car.
-Raquel

Comentario

Hello,

I have a great-grandfather who lived and worked at the Simmons Brickyard in Los Angeles County, I am not sure if that is the same RR that you are discussing here.

It is difficult to find information/pictures/etc., about the location.

I cannot find my great grandfather or his family on any census records, either (for that time period that they were there).

Kristine

Comentario

Kristine,
Thanks so much for introducing me to the Simon's Brick Yard http://montebellohistoricalsociety.org/mhs/Simons.html. I grew up not far from where it was and had no idea it had existed. My dad, who moved to LA in 1949, recalls the brickyard, but didn't know there was company housing on the site, too. My mom worked in a factory in the mid50s on Vail Ave, apparently near where the brickyard had been. It is unrelated to the RR Section Houses but may have had some things in common with them. I would guess that, being in the city, the homes in Simon had electricity, which the RR section housing largely did not.

Thanks again.

Raquel

Comentario

Hello,

I never knew they existed either, prior to finding the information on my GGrandfather's WWI Draft Registration Card.

I still have not found much information on his stay there, the search goes on.

Hope you find out more info on the RR section housing that you are looking for.

Kristine =)

Name Abreviation : Jph. Antta.

What does the Abreviated name stand for . Jph. Antta. found in a mexico Baptism record.

Comentarios

Comentario

Is it one person?

If so that would be Josepha Antonia. If it is two separate people "Jph." is the abbreviation for Joseph (it would Josepha if it was Jpha.) and "Antta." is the abbreviation for Antonia.

Hope this helps!

Sergio Sean Salés

Comentario

David Serna

yes thank you this is a male .. and there is perhaps a small " o " elevated after the Antt. so yes Antnonio sounds correct.. I have never seen Jph.before as an entry so this church entry style is unfamiliar to me . this is in Tepetongo In 1805.

Research request for Vigil, de Herrera Cantillana, Jimenez de Ancizo and unknown single woman in Zacatecas area

Research request for Vigil, de Herrera Cantillana, Jimenez de Ancizo and
unknown single woman in Zacatecas area
Confirmation of birth dates, baptisms, marriage dates
When they arrived in New Spain

Comentarios

Comentario

Robert Martinez

I wrote an article many years ago titled NOTES ON THE MONTES VIGIL FAMILY OF ZACATECAS for Herencia Journal, which is for the Hispanic Genealogical Research Center of New Mexico. It has a lot of entries from the civil archives in Zacatecas for the Vigil family.

So far, not much is known about the ancestry of Catalina de Herrera Cantillana, except she came from Spain.

I will see if a pasajero entry has been found for her. Francisco's mother may never be known, as in two wills, his father Juan Montes Vigil never gave his mother's name.

The Jimenez de Ancizo family has yet to be researched, to my knowledge. But I am continuing my search for these ancestors, as are many other dedicated researchers and genealogists.

Comentario

Hi Tricia,

I'm sorry I can't offer any information on the Vigil family from Zacatecas
but I do have a question for you. It seems that several of the Francisco
Vigil's had this as a surname - Montes Vigil De Santillana

When I go to the LDS new.familysearch.org site and follow the various links
going back I don't see the person who was a
parent/grandparent/greatgrandparent who wore the Santillana surname. Do you
know how Santillana was introduced to this line of Montes Vigil de
Santillana's???

Main reason I'm asking is that my Balthasar Vigil is referred to as
Balthasar Vigil Antillana in one record and since Antillana is so rare I
have to think it is Santillana and that maybe there is a connection here:

Jan.28, 1780 Juana Nepomucena Carvajal, HL Dionicio Carvajal y Juana Vargas
con Jose Antonio Vigil Antillana, HL Barltasar Vigil Antillana y Juana
Lugarda Tafoya

Do you think that the name comes from the "Herrera Cantillana" you mention
in your email. Really stretching here but Balthasar's wife Lugarda Tafoya's
parents are Francisco Tafoya and Juana de Herrera, hmm, wonder if he married
a Herrera that might be related to your Herrera Catillana family?

Thanks for any help,

Joseph

=========================

Joseph Puentes
Clean@h2opodcast.com
http://h2opodcast.com/vsse.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org [mailto:research-
> bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org] On Behalf Of Tricia Carrillo
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:55 PM
> To: research@nuestrosranchos.org
> Cc: wconnor86@yahoo.com
> Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Research request for Vigil, de Herrera
Cantillana, Jimenez de
> Ancizo and unknown single woman in Zacatecas area
>
> Research request for Vigil, de Herrera Cantillana, Jimenez de Ancizo and
unknown single
> woman in Zacatecas area Confirmation of birth dates, baptisms, marriage
dates When they
> arrived in New Spain Related history while in Zacatecas
>
> Juan Montes Vigil, II was born in 1600 in Feligrasa de San Martino de
Siero, Castilla,
> Spain and died Before 1682 in Vecinos Mexico City. He sailed from Spain
and arrived in
> Nueva Espana in Jun 20 1611.
> Father: Juan Montes Vigil, I was born in 1570 in Siero,
> Asturias, Asturias, Spain and died on an unknown date in Spain
> Mother: Maria Vigil [de Vigil] was born About 1570 in
Siero, Asturias,
> Asturias, Spain and died on an unknown date.
> Catalina Vigil [de Herrera Cantillana] born in 1600 in San Martino de
Siero, Asturias,
> Spain, Married Juan Montes II Died in 1619 in Zacatecas New Spain and
died in 1682 in
> Mexico City, Districto Federal Mexico..
> Father? Would like to know more about th de Herrera
Cantillana
> genealogoy
> Mother?
> Juan Montes Vigil, III was born in 1620 in Zacatecas New Spain and died in
Oct. 1682 in
> Zacatecas New Spain. He met Single Woman Unknown.
> Who was the Mother of Francisco?
> Who was in the household?
> Francisco Montes Vigil was born in 1666 in El Real de Zacatecas, New Spain
and died on
> Sep. 11, 1730 in Santa Cruz Santa Fe New Mexico.
> Maria Vigil [Jimenez de Ancizo] was born in 1668 ? in El Real Zacatecas
Married
> Francisco Montes Vigil 1682 or 1683? in Zacatecas New Spain. Nov.
> 19, 1745 in Santa Cruz de la Canada New Mexico
> Father? Would like to know more about Jimenez de Ancizo family
> Mother?
> children born to Francisco and Maria in Zacatecas
> Domingo Montes Vigil 1693 Augas Calientes, Zacatecas
> Maria De La Concepcion 1684
> Were there any other family members or household who traveled with
them to New
> Mexico?
> Children born in Santa Cruz de la Canada New Mexico:
> Pedro Policarpio Montes 1687
> Manuel Montes 1701
> Francisco Montes II 1702
> Gertrudis Montes Vigil 1704
> Juan Montes iv
> Eloena
>
>
> Thank you very much for your assistance! We are very excited to learn more
about our
> family!
>
> Regards,
> Tricia Carrillo, PMP
> 949 6831776
> triciac@cox.net
>
>

Comentario

Joseph and Tricia:

This is my grandmother´s line she was born in Albuquerque, New Mexico in 1929, but was grew up in the San Francisco/Oakland area during the 40-50s. She descends from Francisco Montes de Vigil son of Capt. Francisco Montes de Vigil and María Jiménez de Ancizo, the couple before mentioned. Through their son, Francisco Montes y Vigil who married Lorenza Quintana de Molina Medina married on 28 June 1744 in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Through sucession, this line would later marry into Lucero de Godoy, Romero and Chávez y Durán, whom my grandmother descends.

Everyone probably already knows the following, but it never gets too old, One word of caution with FamilySearch Pedigree Resource File, never take it to be the last deciding voice. It seems people like to publish facts without supporting records on certain ocassions. I have found on numerous ocasions errors to these so-called genealogies in which I had to correct and even reconstruct entire genealogical trees. Always support facts with records, the Montes y Vigil famiy is rich in records, familysearch, microfilm, PARES, and various instituitions in Mexico City, Valladolid, Madrid and so on. Various authors have also published numerous articles and books on the New Mexico families that can be of use. I have not followed this line with much attention, but every now and then I get a spark of interest.

The house of Santillana is definately linked to this family, for Montes de Vigil were from Asturias and Santillana was established in this principality and in the nearby Cantabria area at the end of XIV century. From here the family would spread over the Iberian peninsula and the New World.

For example, the 1611 crossing of Juan Montes de Vigil to the new world is compromised of 24 pages, a certain portion was extracted to appear in the search results. How many have read all 24 pages? I know I have finished reading all 24. Through this and other important records, especially the Ejuecutorias de Hidalguía (Proof of Nobility) the earliest we find registered is 24 Nov 1587 in Valladolid, where Pedro Montes Vigil executes before the Chancillery. A quick overview would easily set the Vigil family a family of the Asturian nobility. The name is a bit older than we think it appears somewhere at the end of XV and XVI centuries. Someone compounded this surname, but who? From what I have researched Vigil is the main trunk of the family. It splits into three branches, Montes Vigil, Vigil and de Vigil Quinoñes. Montes Vigil was probably a result of a female member of the Vigil family marrying a man of "lower status" as to hidalguía, and therefore was to continue to carry on the Vigil surname, a very common trait during this period of research and especially place.

If we were to study the ejecutorias de Hidalguía we would find out that Juan Montes de Vigil married Catalina de Santillana Herrera, (Catalina has nothing to do with Vigil) researchers have attached the Vigil to her. I have not identified her parents, since the ejecutoria only applies to the male line, this is her husband. Juan II would be son of Juan Montes de Vigil and María de Vigil. Juan would be grandson of Lucas Montes de Vigil and Isabel de Vigil and Francisco de Vigil and Catalina de Arguelles y Quinoñes, this last couple being the founders of the surname Vigil y Quinoñes. If we notice, Juan Montes de Vigil has three lines of Vigil, which is very common in this period in Cantabria-Asturias. These families were very old and reknown, mostly descendants of the original Christian warriors from the VIII-X centuries.

The Vigil family was very well established since the XV century, they had proved their lineage, their hidalguía (which is different from those who inherit titles), hidalgos are nobles by birth through their paternal line, on the contrary those titled must depend on titles of their ancestors. They held various postitions in government, notably regidor del consejo, which was strictly for hijosdalgos during the XVI-XVIII centuries. Many descendants entered into various orders of knighthood, Santiago, Calatrava, etc. There is much research to do with this family.

Genealogy is not just a hobby, though it may start out as one. It is a rigorous inestigation process, reports to be complied, records to be archived, books to be purchased, read, analyzed and reported. Deductions based on reason, facts, and many other types of records: wills, land grants, journals, passages, limpeza de sangre, ejecutoria de higalguía, probanza de nobleza. Baptismal, Marriages and Deaths from the Catholic Church are the basic, and very least of records. There are many archives to be accessed. In my family´s home we have an entire room dedicated to genealogy, our archive is enormous, last time I counted it had at least 50 boxes worth of records, each registered and filed, each box with at least 1200 records of some sort. My grandfather initialized this great work. I am now obtaining digitzalied records of everything to store in case of a distaster. For us Latter-day Saints genealogy is much more. It truly is a work and requires dedication and study and research. But it´s very fulfilling to know who we are and where we come from and where were going.

These are my few lines, now that I have seen I have prolonged this reponse, I hope this helps in some way.

Daniel Méndez de Torres Camino

Comentario

well written Daniel..
Linda

________________________________
From: Daniel Mendez de Torres Camino
To: Nuestros Ranchos
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Nuestros Ranchos] Montes y Vigil

Joseph and Tricia:

This is my grandmother´s line she was born in Albuquerque, New Mexico in 1929, but was grew up in the San Francisco/Oakland area during the 40-50s. She descends from Francisco Montes de Vigil son of Capt. Francisco Montes de Vigil and María Jiménez de Ancizo, the couple before mentioned. Through their son, Francisco Montes y Vigil who married Lorenza Quintana de Molina Medina married on 28 June 1744 in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Through sucession, this line would later marry into Lucero de Godoy, Romero and Chávez y Durán, whom my grandmother descends.

Everyone probably already knows the following, but it never gets too old, One word of caution with FamilySearch Pedigree Resource File, never take it to be the last deciding voice. It seems people like to publish facts without supporting records on certain ocassions. I have found on numerous ocasions errors to these so-called genealogies in which I had to correct and even reconstruct entire genealogical trees. Always support facts with records, the Montes y Vigil famiy is rich in records, familysearch, microfilm, PARES, and various instituitions in Mexico City, Valladolid, Madrid and so on. Various authors have also published numerous articles and books on the New Mexico families that can be of use. I have not followed this line with much attention, but every now and then I get a spark of interest.

The house of Santillana is definately linked to this family, for Montes de Vigil were from Asturias and Santillana was established in this principality and in the nearby Cantabria area at the end of XIV century. From here the family would spread over the Iberian peninsula and the New World.

For example, the 1611 crossing of Juan Montes de Vigil to the new world is compromised of 24 pages, a certain portion was extracted to appear in the search results. How many have read all 24 pages? I know I have finished reading all 24. Through this and other important records, especially the Ejuecutorias de Hidalguía (Proof of Nobility) the earliest we find registered is 24 Nov 1587 in Valladolid, where Pedro Montes Vigil executes before the Chancillery. A quick overview would easily set the Vigil family a family of the Asturian nobility. The name is a bit older than we think it appears somewhere at the end of XV and XVI centuries. Someone compounded this surname, but who? From what I have researched Vigil is the main trunk of the family. It splits into three branches, Montes Vigil, Vigil and de Vigil Quinoñes. Montes Vigil was probably a result of a female member of the Vigil family marrying a man of "lower status" as to hidalguía, and therefore was
to continue to carry on the Vigil surname, a very common trait during this period of research and especially place.

If we were to study the ejecutorias de Hidalguía we would find out that Juan Montes de Vigil married Catalina de Santillana Herrera, (Catalina has nothing to do with Vigil) researchers have attached the Vigil to her. I have not identified her parents, since the ejecutoria only applies to the male line, this is her husband. Juan II would be son of Juan Montes de Vigil and María de Vigil. Juan would be grandson of Lucas Montes de Vigil and Isabel de Vigil and Francisco de Vigil and Catalina de Arguelles y Quinoñes, this last couple being the founders of the surname Vigil y Quinoñes. If we notice, Juan Montes de Vigil has three lines of Vigil, which is very common in this period in Cantabria-Asturias. These families were very old and reknown, mostly descendants of the original Christian warriors from the VIII-X centuries.

The Vigil family was very well established since the XV century, they had proved their lineage, their hidalguía (which is different from those who inherit titles), hidalgos are nobles by birth through their paternal line, on the contrary those titled must depend on titles of their ancestors. They held various postitions in government, notably regidor del consejo, which was strictly for hijosdalgos during the XVI-XVIII centuries. Many descendants entered into various orders of knighthood, Santiago, Calatrava, etc. There is much research to do with this family.

Genealogy is not just a hobby, though it may start out as one. It is a rigorous inestigation process, reports to be complied, records to be archived, books to be purchased, read, analyzed and reported. Deductions based on reason, facts, and many other types of records: wills, land grants, journals, passages, limpeza de sangre, ejecutoria de higalguía, probanza de nobleza. Baptismal, Marriages and Deaths from the Catholic Church are the basic, and very least of records. There are many archives to be accessed. In my family´s home we have an entire room dedicated to genealogy, our archive is enormous, last time I counted it had at least 50 boxes worth of records, each registered and filed, each box with at least 1200 records of some sort. My grandfather initialized this great work. I am now obtaining digitzalied records of everything to store in case of a distaster. For us Latter-day Saints genealogy is much more. It truly is a work and requires
dedication and study and research. But it´s very fulfilling to know who we are and where we come from and where were going.

These are my few lines, now that I have seen I have prolonged this reponse, I hope this helps in some way.

Daniel Méndez de Torres Camino
                       

Request help reading Calvillo, Ags. Church record. Jan. 26, 1855 Lopez y Serna

Igesia San Jose, Calvillo,Ags. Bautismos. January 26, 1855. The image is Number 14 of 61 images entry No. 22.

Comentarios

Comentario

David Serna
I had some reservations on the Fermina translation. On the Image before this (Image 13 of 161) In entry 16 the F in Fabian seems to confirm the Fermina Translation.But I have been unable to find any information on this couple. Jose Maria Serna and Fermina Valdivia.
thank you for this assistance.

Info : Esteban Frausto y Getrudis Lara, Tabasco, Zac. (Santa Maria MecaTabasco )

Buscando Informacion de una pareja que encontre los Bautismos de Santa Maria Mecatabasco, Villa del Refugio, Tabasco, Zacatecas. Ellos fueron los padrinos de Macedonio de La Cerna Sept. 14, 1814.

Comentarios

Another Interesting IGI Entry

Again, thank you so much for your help. I am so happy. Helen
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: arturoramos
>
> Helen:
>
> Here is another interesting entry that may or may not be your ancestor but the

Comentarios

Comentario

Femat and Femá with Romo de Vivar

Hello

I came across this information today:

The name Femá is also written as Femat, judging from two documents:

1. Marriage dispensa for Don Fernando Femá and Dona Teodora Romo de Vivar,
Mexico, Jalisco, Catholic...Church Records, 1590-1995
Guadalajara
Diócesis de Guadalajara
Matrimonios 1735-1819
Image 45 of 278

This doc has a tree for Monica Romo de Vivar and two of her sons and their sons and their son/daughter (who wish to marry). One son of Monica has the name Fermin Femá and the other is given as Pedro Romo de Vivar.

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1-18402-92423-90?cc=1874591&wc…

2. The Información Matrimonial for Fermín Antonio Femat and
Mónica Romo de Vivar (dated 17/Oct/1715 in Aguascalientes, Sagrario) IMAGE 166 ON THE FOLLOWING:
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11627-22110-47?cc=1410092&…

Monica's proposed husband is named as Fermin Antonio Femat, and his father has the same name (end with a "t", no accent mark)

Regards
Denise Fastrup

Comentario

Dear Group,
I'm hoping there's someone out there that likes reading the old church entries.  This is an unusual request, I know; but I don't know any other way to do this.  On the pilot site, I'm researching difunciones entries for Nstra Sra De Guadalupe, Salinas Victoria, Nvo Leon 1745-1836, specifically image 140.  It's on the right, third from the bottom.  This is my 7ggrandfather, Martin De Arrambide, and I need to know if I'm reading the entry correctly.  I'm not sure about a word that comes after his name; it could indicate that my research with that line is finished in Mexico.  Also, does it say that he had a mason's burial?  What's that? I'm confused and all help would be greatly appreciated.   Thanks so much,   Alice